I used to work for a guy who started every job interview with “So, what are you good at?” Then, later on, he’d asked, “Okay, now tell me what you’re not so good at.”
When I was in college, the job placement office told us we had to have an answer for that question. I assume everybody who coaches job candidates does the same. Which is why few candidates were ever surprised by the question.
What’s surprising was how bad their answers were.
- “Well, some people say I take my work too seriously. I’m sort of a workaholic.”
- “I’ve been told that I’m too hard on myself. I set my expectations too high.”
- “I’m a little too impatient.”
These are, of course, examples of dressing up a strength as a weakness, which is manipulative and unhelpful. Sharp interviewers are looking for evidence of two things when they ask the “What are your weaknesses” question:
Candor. Only phonies pretend they have no weaknesses. If they lie about that, what else will they lie about?
Confidence. People who know their strengths have the self-assurance to admit a weakness.
I once had a guy applying for a senior executive position tell me, “I’m very good at overseeing high-level employees but not very effective with low-level employees.” When I pushed him about why he was ineffective, he said he knew exactly which levers to pull to motivate high-level employees but not low-level ones.
I could see it bothered him a little. He wanted to be better at understanding the rank and file. Admitting this weakness made him seem human to me. Since his job would be to oversee high-level employees, his weakness wouldn’t hurt him. Admitting it gave him credibility in my eyes.
Subscribe to the Leadership Blog
Get the latest research on workplace learning with weekly posts delivered to your inbox