Who learns more: Those who do, or those who just watch?

by on January 8, 2014 · 0 Comment POSTED IN: Rapid Learning Insights
employee-training-session

It’s an article of faith that hands-on learning has a lot more impact than just sitting back and watching.

By extension, most people just assume that e-learning modules work better when they’re interactive, that simulations are more effective than presentations, and that you’ll learn more from performing in a role play than from watching one.

Well, not so fast. A recent study offers evidence that “vicarious” learning experiences – watching versus doing – can be highly effective.

In some cases, they may actually be more effective than hands-on learning, especially for high-level soft skills.

The research
Medical-education researchers set up a 30-minute role-play between a medical student playing a doctor and someone chosen to simulate patient responses.

The goal was to elicit information about the “patient’s” medical condition,
which required soft skills such as empathy, guiding the conversation, listening for key details, and asking good questions.

In one set of simulations, a medical student conducted the interview while another observed. Then there was a feedback session. Then the participant and observer switched.

The researchers were trying to determine:

  • whether students learned more from doing or watching;
  • whether it was better to observe first and then do, or vice versa, and
  • whether students learned more if they were given a script to study first.

Check out the Leadership & Management Rapid Learning Center FREE. Get instant access to a collection of 6- to 10-minute modules perfect for training supervisors and managers throughout your organization.

The results
At various points in the study, researchers debriefed the students to see what they’d learned.

Those who’d observed the role plays learned more than those who’d performed. They provided more accurate, useful feedback during the debriefing session.

The researchers also found that the order didn’t matter. Whether observers went first or second, they consistently performed better.

In addition, the study found that scripts helped the participants elicit more useful information and guide the conversation more effectively.

Implications
Here are some suggestions for applying this research:

  1. Don’t assume that vicarious learning is inferior. There’s a place for interactivity and learning-by-doing, but they’re not always the right option.
  2. A little detachment can be a good thing. When we’re in the thick of things, we’re sometimes too busy to see how we’re doing. It may be easier to see what others are doing right or wrong than to see it in ourselves.
  3. In role plays, give people the opportunity to observe. If you have everyone practicing and nobody watching, participants will miss some things.
  4. Scripts matter. Offer best-practice scripts for role plays whenever possible. That will avoid “easy errors” in conversation and get the role play into deeper territory more quickly.

Source
Stegman, K. et al. (2012). Vicarious learning during simulations: Is it more effective than hands on learning? Medical Education 46(10), 1001-8.

You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email - simply add your email address to the box below and click the "Subscribe" button.

Close

Request a Demo

We'd love to show you how this industry-leading training system can help you develop your team. Please fill out this quick form or give us a call at 877-792-2172 to schedule your one-on-one demo with a Rapid Learning Specialist.
  • xxx-xxx-xxxx i.e. 123-456-7890
  • We're sorry, but we do not accept personal email addresses at Gmail, Yahoo!, or Hotmail. Please contact us at 877-792-2172 if you do not have a corporate email address.