<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: FMLA compliance is a two-way street</title> <atom:link href="http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/</link> <description>Concise, fast-paced online training and state-of-the-art e-learning solutions</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr.b21pubs.com/?p=1130#comment-1149</guid> <description>I received paperwork with regard to a request for FMLA which I never made. Furthermore, the letter stipulated that I requested it on a day I was not scheduled to work, did not contact anyone from work for any reason and (finally) how many HR people actually ever worked on a Sunday?Seems like a &quot;bums rush&quot; out the door to me, especially considering that it was a decision of a manager that resulted in my permanent injury, surgery and ultimatly, the inability to perform my function hence, out the door I was sent. So LT, it seems to me that although my &quot;position&quot; is safe (providing I send a registered letter every month for the rest of my life stating intent to come back if I ever recover), the employer seems to benefit more under FMLA...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received paperwork with regard to a request for FMLA which I never made. Furthermore, the letter stipulated that I requested it on a day I was not scheduled to work, did not contact anyone from work for any reason and (finally) how many HR people actually ever worked on a Sunday?</p><p>Seems like a &#8220;bums rush&#8221; out the door to me, especially considering that it was a decision of a manager that resulted in my permanent injury, surgery and ultimatly, the inability to perform my function hence, out the door I was sent. So LT, it seems to me that although my &#8220;position&#8221; is safe (providing I send a registered letter every month for the rest of my life stating intent to come back if I ever recover), the employer seems to benefit more under FMLA&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Srf432</title><link>http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link> <dc:creator>Srf432</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr.b21pubs.com/?p=1130#comment-1112</guid> <description>If any of the owners of a private business own other business at other locations; are those employees counted as part of the total employees?(as far as FMLA regulations is concerned)TY for any response </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any of the owners of a private business own other business at other locations; are those employees counted as part of the total employees?(as far as FMLA regulations is concerned)TY for any response</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ltmoney</title><link>http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link> <dc:creator>Ltmoney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr.b21pubs.com/?p=1130#comment-728</guid> <description>FMLA seems to protect the employee(their job and their position) ... but often tends to have a profoundly negative effect on daily operations of The Company.  The frequent  and long-term absences of an FMLA employee requires  additional  staff to fullfill the  job  duties during their medical leave, added costs for overtime,  distruptions of entire departments to allow the FMLA employee to retain their job title, and execessive manhours spent  with the employee when they finally return to work.  What protects &quot;The Company&quot;  who is in need of strong and staff members who are able  to work regularly??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FMLA seems to protect the employee(their job and their position) &#8230; but often tends to have a profoundly negative effect on daily operations of The Company.  The frequent  and long-term absences of an FMLA employee requires  additional  staff to fullfill the  job  duties during their medical leave, added costs for overtime,  distruptions of entire departments to allow the FMLA employee to retain their job title, and execessive manhours spent  with the employee when they finally return to work.  What protects &#8220;The Company&#8221;  who is in need of strong and staff members who are able  to work regularly??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr.b21pubs.com/?p=1130#comment-572</guid> <description>Thanks for your comment. We can&#039;t respond to questions about specific situations or provide legal advice, but we invite other readers to post comments or responses to this question. We encourage you to seek guidance from your HR department or, for legal questions, consult an attorney.Michael Boyette Executive Editor Rapid Learning Institute PO Box A Morton, PA 19070 mboyette@rapidlearninginstitute.com 484-479-2715</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. We can&#8217;t respond to questions about specific<br /> situations or provide legal advice, but we invite other readers to post<br /> comments or responses to this question. We encourage you to seek guidance<br /> from your HR department or, for legal questions, consult an attorney.</p><p>Michael Boyette<br /> Executive Editor<br /> Rapid Learning Institute<br /> PO Box A<br /> Morton, PA 19070</p><p><a href="mailto:mboyette@rapidlearninginstitute.com">mboyette@rapidlearninginstitute.com</a><br /> 484-479-2715</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Abeene3440</title><link>http://rapidlearninginstitute.com/hric/fmla-compliance-two-way-street/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link> <dc:creator>Abeene3440</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr.b21pubs.com/?p=1130#comment-569</guid> <description>For a chronic condition can leave be denied because the doctor did not put in specific dates the person was to be seen? this is in regard to an already accepted claim that was to be recertified.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a chronic condition can leave be denied because the doctor did not put in specific dates the person was to be seen? this is in regard to an already accepted claim that was to be recertified.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimization 

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using apc

Served from: rapidlearninginstitute.com @ 2012-02-05 22:01:00 -->
